In accordance with the "Notice of the General Office of the State Council on the Issuance of Air Pollution Control Action Plan Implementation Measures (Trial)", the Ministry of Environmental Protection, the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Finance, the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development, and the Energy Bureau The 6 ministries and commissions recently announced the Implementation Rules for the Implementation of the Air Pollution Prevention and Control Action Plan (Trial Implementation) (hereinafter referred to as the “Implementation Rulesâ€).
According to the scoring method of the “Regulationsâ€, the state will score the completion of the air quality improvement target task and the completion of the air pollution prevention key tasks, and the two ratings are all implemented in a percentage system. Among them, the results of the 10 provinces (autonomous regions and municipalities) in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region and the surrounding areas, the Yangtze River Delta region and the Pearl River Delta region are the lower scores of the two types of scores; the scores in other regions are the scores for the completion of the air quality improvement target. .
The results of the assessment will be divided into four grades of excellent, good, qualified and unqualified. The scores are excellent at 90 points and above, 70 points (inclusive) to 90 points are good, and 60 points (inclusive) to 70 points are qualified. Less than 60 points is unqualified.
According to the “Implementation Rulesâ€, the air quality improvement target assessment will reduce the annual average concentration of the two indicators of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and respirable particulate matter (PM10). As an important basis. The average annual concentration of the two indicators is not lower than that of the previous year, and all counts are 0 points.
Among them, for the provinces that have assessed PM2.5, the annual average concentration of PM2.5 will not be assessed in 2013, and the annual average concentration of PM2.5 in 2014, 2015 and 2016 should reach the “Responsibility for Air Pollution Prevention and Control Targets†(hereinafter referred to as The "Responsibility Letter" will be approved for 10%, 35%, and 65% of the air quality improvement target. The final assessment for 2017 will complete the task of reducing the average annual concentration of PM2.5 in the Target Responsibility Book.
The annual average concentration of PM2.5 decreases to meet the assessment requirements, accounting for 60 points; if the assessment requirements are not met, the actual reduction in the average annual concentration of PM2.5 accounts for the proportion of the assessment requirements multiplied by 60; the annual average concentration of PM2.5 Compared with the previous year, it does not fall, but counts 0 points. On the basis of the completion of the annual assessment requirements, 40 points shall be calculated for exceeding the target of air quality improvement approved by the Target Responsibility Book by more than 30%; if less than 30%, the proportion of 30% of the excess completion ratio shall be multiplied by 40. Score.
For the provinces that have assessed PM10, the “Regulations†clearly stipulate that the annual average concentration of PM10 will not be assessed in 2013; the annual average concentration of PM10 in 2014 will be set by the local people's governments or meet the target air quality improvement target of the “Responsibility Letterâ€. 10%; the annual average concentration of PM10 in 2015 will reach 30% of the target air quality improvement target of the Target Responsibility Book; the annual average concentration of PM10 in 2016 will reach 60% of the target air quality improvement target of the Target Responsibility Book; The 2017 final assessment completed the Target Responsibility Book and approved the target of PM10 annual average concentration reduction.
Among them, for the annual average concentration requirement of PM10 decreased, but the annual average concentration of PM10 did not reach the “Environmental Air Quality Standard†(GB3095-2012) provinces (autonomous regions and municipalities), the annual average concentration of PM10 decreased to meet the assessment requirements, 60 If the assessment requirements are not met, the proportion of the actual decrease in the average annual concentration of PM10 in the assessment requirements is multiplied by 60; the annual average concentration of PM10 is not lower than that of the previous year, and 0 is counted. On the basis of the completion of the annual assessment requirements, 40 points shall be calculated for exceeding the target of air quality improvement approved by the Target Responsibility Book by more than 30%; if less than 30%, the proportion of 30% of the excess completion ratio shall be multiplied by 40. Score.
For the provinces (autonomous regions and municipalities) where the annual average concentration of PM10 is reduced and the annual average PM10 concentration reaches the Ambient Air Quality Standard (GB3095-2012), the annual average concentration of PM10 reaches the Ambient Air Quality Standard (GB3095-2012). ) Requirements, 40 points. The annual average concentration of PM10 decreases to meet the assessment requirements, accounting for 20 points; if the assessment requirements are not met, the actual proportion of PM10 annual average concentration is taken as the proportion of the assessment requirements multiplied by 20; the average annual concentration of PM10 is not compared with the previous year. If the drop is reversed, count 0 points. On this basis, the average annual concentration of PM10 will increase by 1% and deduct 1 point. On the basis of the completion of the annual assessment requirements, 40 points shall be calculated for exceeding the approved air quality improvement target of the Target Responsibility Book by more than 30% (including); if less than 30%, the proportion of the excess completion ratio shall be 30% multiplied by 40 scores.
For Hainan Province, Tibet Autonomous Region, and Yunnan Province, where air quality requirements continue to improve, the annual average concentration of PM10 meets the requirements of the Ambient Air Quality Standard (GB3095-2012), accounting for 70 points; compared with the base year, the annual average concentration of PM10 increases. 1%, deduct 1 point. The average annual concentration of PM10 is 5% or more (inclusive) compared with the evaluation base, which is 30 points. If it is less than 5%, the actual percentage of PM10 annual average concentration is 5%, multiplied by 30 to score.
In addition, the annual average concentration of PM2.5 in Guangdong Province and the annual average concentration of PM10 decreased, and the weights were 70% and 30%, respectively. The total score was the weighted average of the two.
To assess the completion of the ten air pollution prevention and control tasks, the highest atmospheric environmental management scores in the assessment of the completion of key tasks for air pollution prevention and control, the implementation of the detailed list of 10 specific indicators.
The industrial structure adjustment and optimization indicators accounted for 12 points, including the newly-capacity control of the industries with severe overcapacity, the overcapacity of the industries with serious overcapacity, the clean-up of projects under construction, the environmentally-friendly relocation of heavy polluting enterprises, and the elimination of backward production capacity by 6 points. For the newly-capacity control of industries with severe overcapacity and meeting the work requirements, two points will be found. If a new capacity project for the industry with serious violation of approval and record overcapacity is found, 0.5 points will be deducted and two points will be deducted. For projects with serious overcapacity in the construction of illegal projects under construction and meeting the requirements of the work, two points will be found. If a project with serious capacity overcapacity is found to be under construction, the deduction will be 0.5 points and the two points will be deducted.
In the assessment, clean production indicators accounted for 6 points. The rectification index of coal-fired small boilers accounted for 10 points, including the elimination of coal-fired small boilers and the entry of new coal-fired boilers. Industrial air pollution control indicators accounted for 15 points, including industrial smoke dust control, industrial volatile organic matter governance two sub-indicators. Urban dust pollution control indicators accounted for 8 points, including construction site dust pollution control, road dust pollution control two sub-indicators. The vehicle pollution prevention and control indicators accounted for 12 points, including the elimination of yellow-label vehicles, the management of environmentally-friendly vehicles for motor vehicles, the construction of motor vehicle environmental supervision capabilities, the promotion of new energy vehicles, and the construction of five sub-indicators for urban pedestrian and bicycle transportation systems. Building energy efficiency and heating measurement indicators accounted for 5 points, including new building energy conservation, heating measurement two sub-indicators. The capital investment indicators for air pollution control account for 6 points. It is required to establish a diversified investment mechanism for the government, enterprises and society to ensure the stable sources of funds for air pollution prevention and control, increase the investment of local financial funds at all levels, and clarify the responsibility of corporate pollution control.
The atmospheric environmental management index has a high score, accounting for 16 points. A total of six sub-indicators for the annual implementation plan preparation, account management, heavy pollution weather monitoring and early warning emergency system construction, atmospheric environmental monitoring quality management, straw burning and environmental information disclosure . Among them, the construction of heavy pollution weather monitoring and early warning emergency system has the largest score, reaching 5 points, followed by environmental information disclosure 4 points, atmospheric environmental monitoring quality management accounting for 3 points, annual implementation plan accounting for two points, accounting management accounted for 1 point, straw burning is 1 point.
In addition, the public is more concerned about the coal management and oil supply indicators index score of 10 points, for Beijing, Tianjin, Hebei, Shandong, Shanghai, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Guangdong, this indicator for coal consumption Total control and supply of oil products from Guosi and Guowu; for other regions, supply of coal washing and processing and oil supply of Guosi and Guowu. Among them, Beijing, Tianjin, and Hebei Province have increased the clean coal management indicators.
The definition of electric strapper: electric strapper is to be packaged with electric tension, friction buckle, automatic banding with a strapping a strapping machinery.
It mainly consists of five parts: 1, the motor part; 2, the electric part of the tightening; 3, the deduction to do part of the friction; 4, the body;
Electric strapper works: the plastic band or plastic packing belt, wrapped around the object from the top after a lap, the packing with the joints into the machine working tank, driven by the motor tightening wheel, the packing belt tight , By friction as a way to buckle with adhesive, and finally automatically cut.
Electric strapper features: high flexibility, fast, safe, easy and environmentally friendly.
Horizontal Strapping Machine,Automatic Horizontal Strapping Machine,Horizontal Seal Strapping Machine,Horizontal Electric Strapping Machine
Shandong Sinolion Machinery Corp., Ltd. , https://www.sinolion.cc